Skip to content

U.S. medical panel strongly advocates for immunization

Anti-vaccine-leaning US panel under scrutiny commences contentious hearing, asserting unwavering support for vaccines amid criticism from public health specialists...

U.S. medical body reiterates strong support for vaccination
U.S. medical body reiterates strong support for vaccination

U.S. medical panel strongly advocates for immunization

The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) is currently in the midst of a two-day meeting to discuss potential changes to the standard childhood vaccine schedule. The committee, which was handpicked by President Donald Trump's top health official, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., has faced criticism and concern from various medical, scientific, and policy communities.

The revised ACIP committee, which includes members known as vaccine critics, has raised eyebrows due to fears that ideology rather than science may guide future public health decisions in the United States. In June 2025, Kennedy replaced all 17 members of the committee, appointing eight new members.

One of the most contentious issues on the table is the potential delay of childhood shots against Hepatitis B. Kennedy has questioned the necessity of administering the Hepatitis B shot to newborns, citing its sexual and needle-transmitted nature. However, infectious disease specialists like Amesh Adalja from Johns Hopkins University have criticized Kennedy's focus on Hepatitis B, describing it as "a play on people's ignorance."

The ACIP's decisions on vaccine recommendations could have real consequences for every community in America. Experts, including epidemiologist Syra Madad, have expressed concern that shifting the childhood vaccine schedule could be detrimental, likening it to pulling bricks out of the foundation of public health. Madad stated that such changes could cause unnecessary confusion and concern among parents.

The ACIP's agenda also includes consideration of shifts in requirements for private insurers regarding vaccines, the implications of the Covid-19 shot in terms of access and affordability, and the Covid-19 vaccine and the combination MMRV shot (measles, mumps, rubella, and varicella).

The committee's current members have asserted that they welcome scientific critique of their votes, acknowledging gray areas due to incomplete scientific knowledge. Accusations that the ACIP's members are "unscientific" have been cast as false by the panel's members.

However, Kennedy's actions and views on vaccines, particularly Hepatitis B, have been criticized by infectious disease specialists. Kennedy has a history of promoting vaccine misinformation, including the widely debunked claim that the MMR shot causes autism.

The potential changes to the vaccine schedule are expected to have far-reaching implications. For instance, revised recommendations could lead to a restriction of federal funding for vaccines for low-income families. The ACIP's decisions will undoubtedly shape the future of public health in the United States, and the debate surrounding these changes is far from over.

Read also:

Latest